I am, as I have said, going through all my cases looking for errors. So far I’ve been making good progress. But there’s an issue I thought I’d address with you blog readers.
There are a number of things about an MP case that will cause me to automatically list them as “endangered missing” rather than simply “missing”: such as if they are under 18 or over 65, if they left their car or other belongings behind, if they have any type of medical condition, etc.
My question: should I add prostitution to that list? After all, it is a high-risk lifestyle. But is that enough to assume that any prostitute who’s dropped out of sight is probably endangered?