A case for more creative naming

As of tomorrow, I will have three people named Maria Mendoza on Charley. All from California. I don’t even know their middle names, so it’s just “Maria Mendoza” three times in a row in my listings. I also have:

4 Jose Gonzalezes
3 John Davises
3 Michael Johnsons
3 Jose Lopezes
3 Juan Rodriguezes
3 Jerry Smiths
2 Michael Blacks
2 Robert Browns
2 Steven Clarks
2 Jose Cruzes
2 Michael Gordons
2 Claudia Guillens (though to be fair they’re mother and daughter)
2 James Harrises
2 William Hendersons
2 William Henrys
2 Thomas Jameses
2 Joshua Johnsons
2 Theresa Johnsons
2 William Joneses
2 Michael Maddens
2 Barbara Martins
2 Joseph Martins
2 Michael McLaughlins
2 Joseph McStays (father and son)
2 Grace Reapps (mother and daughter)
2 James Peterses
2 Lawrence Powells
2 James Robinsons
2 Jose Rodriguezes
2 Harold Simpsons
2 James Smiths
2 John Smiths
2 Robin Smiths
2 John Taylors
2 John Wagners
2 Cheryl Williamses
2 David Williamses
2 Jimmy Williamses
2 Larry Williamses
2 Randy Williamses
2 Jennifer Wilsons
2 William Wrights

That’s how big and annoying the problem is. And there’s probably some more I missed.

For awhile I had two Anthony Davises, two Jose Hernandezes, two Samantha Garcias, two Amy Johnsons, two Brian Joneses, two David Millers, two Karla Rodriguezes, two Miguel Romeros, two James Thompsons and two Kimberly Thompsons but one of each got removed.

How I deal with it: if the second MP has a middle name or middle initial, I go with that. Like, I’ll have good_meaghan_elizabeth or good_meaghan_e. If they don’t have a middle name, I go with good2_meaghan. Sometimes I make an exception. Like, I have reapp_grace and reapp_gracie, since the child’s nickname was Gracie. Or for juniors I sometimes use mcstay_josephj.

Once I had a case where a mother and her four, maybe five daughters disappeared (I forget the exact details, it was back in the MPCCN days), and every single one of the little girls was named Mary. They had different middle names, but still. Imagine when they got old enough to receive mail!

When I take over the world and become Supreme Dictator For Life, I will require people with a common last name like Smith or Brown or Rodriguez to take an uncommon first name. Something like Abijah or Quebec or Ghislaine. If they want to use a common first name, they have to hyphenate their last name. I would also forbid people to give their children the exact same names as themselves — give them a different middle name at least. Like my grandfather and father: both are called Charles, but Grandpa was Charles Henry and Dad is Charles William. This would prevent a lot of paperwork problems.

Article about MPs from South Carolina

I found this month-old article that talks in detail about several missing persons cases out of South Carolina. I can’t find anything I can usey; in fact, it looks like they used the Charley Project as their main source for some of these accounts. Woodrow Taylor, Shanta Johnson, Andrea Hayslette Brittanee Drexel and Lisa Neugent are mentioned, as well as three cases I don’t have: Cynthia Bullock, Glenn Howlett and Rebecca Slavinsky. No pictures for those three, though.

Trying to identify bodies in Harris County, Texas

According to this article, the authorities in Harris County, Texas are renewing their efforts to identify some of the 400-odd John and Jane Does they have in their jurisdiction. One of the Does mentioned in the article was a victim of the serial killer Dean Corll, who preyed on teenage boys during the 1970s.

The county’s forensic anthropology director, Jennifer Love, dubbed “the Bone Detective,” has won a $180,957 grant from the National Institute of Justice that she will use to exhume 25 bodies in the next 18 months. Using money from the grant, she hired another forensic anthropologist, Deborrah Pinto, to comb through hundreds of cold case files for new clues to help decide whom to exhume.

They plan to collect DNA samples from the UIDs to help identify them. But, as the article points out: “in order to use any newly collected DNA samples to restore identities, forensic anthropologists also need new clues from the public.” They’re hoping family members might take note of the distinctive clothes some of the victims were wearing.

Good luck, is all I can say.

(Wow. Two UID posts in one day.)

I hate it when this happens

I just wrote up a casefile — even spent money to buy an article for researching it — only to discover I already posted the same case on Charley (and bought the same article, presumably) almost a year ago.

I have an encyclopedic memory of my Charley cases, but sometimes it fails me.


Just so the money I spent won’t be completely wasted, I decided to update his case with a few incidentals about his life which I didn’t include the first time around.

My memory fail may be partly because of my current condition. I feel as if I’m drunk, but I haven’t had any alcohol in weeks. I am stumbling around, having trouble with my eye-hand coordination, and having trouble focusing my eyes. (As I write this I keep making typos and having to correct them.) I don’t know what’s wrong. I hope it’s nothing bad because I Seriously Cannot Afford another doctor bill. Maybe eating will help. I’m glad there’s food in the house because I’m probably too impaired to drive. *goes to the kitchen to get lunch*

Toddler’s body on NY shore still unidentified

Although I don’t think I ever wrote about it, many of my readers will no doubt be aware of the case where several missing women, mostly prostitutes, were found murdered on the shore of Long Island. A few Charley Project cases were among them. Well, I found this New York Times article about a little girl’s body that was found on the same stretch of beach on April 4 — but a mile away from the other women’s bodies, so the police don’t think the deaths are related. The child, who was between 18 and 24 months old, was however only about 250 feet away from another woman’s head, hands and forearm.

In spite of where her body was found, the police have not classified the toddler’s death as a homicide, since they can find no evidence of trauma to the body. Her body was wrapped carefully in a blanket and hidden in the brush at the foot of a tree, and they think a caregiver, perhaps a parent or both parents, put it there.

It’s been almost two months and it doesn’t sound like the police are anywhere close to identifying the little girl. It’s unlikely she was ever reported missing. Cracking this case may well depend on a neighbor or distant relative realizing they haven’t seen so-and-so’s child in quite a long time and the explanations for her absence don’t hold water.

This case has Boy in the Box overtones. I hope, unlike in that case, they’re able to identify this girl quickly. I usually don’t post about unidentified bodies but this one touched my heart.