7 thoughts on “I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this picture before…

  1. Anthony March 18, 2009 / 6:11 pm

    ….although that link appears to be “broken”; anyway, it’s Case #20, 28 May, under the 1975 listings and yes, a California DOJ one.

  2. Meaghan March 18, 2009 / 7:49 pm

    Thanks. I’ve emailed the DOJ about it and will also put up Daniel’s case again. I guess it accidentally got deleted.

  3. Meaghan March 18, 2009 / 7:50 pm

    No, the case is still there. I see the problem: the computer thinks the ) at the end of your link is part of the URL. *edits comment for you*

  4. Anthony March 18, 2009 / 8:32 pm

    Thanks, Meaghan. “Outfoxed by a machine”—a story of my life. When I originally saw your post, I thought you were right, that I’d seen the fellow’s picture; then I began to think that, really, that picture resembled a sort of “generic missing person o’ the ’70s”-type fellow. Easy enough to find him, though, as, obviously, the picture HAD to be from the ’70s, so it took all of five minutes to locate. Good eye on your part. (On my part, it was “highly receptive to suggestion” behavior.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s